By Lisa T. Bergren
I was so excited about seeing the King Tut exhibit in Denver, that I planned our out-of-state summer trip around it. The last time I’d seen Tutankhamen’s (pronounced Toot-in-common) treasures was in Cairo, back in 1990. Even there, in the ramshackle, crowded museum—that I understand has since had a makeover—the exhibit was inspiring, with its amazing gold and piles upon piles of artifacts.
Given that my kids have a thing for Egypt, I thought this would be perfect. I purchased timed-entry tickets for the fam (including the in-laws) and we made our plans to hit the Denver Art Museum, late on a Thursday afternoon. It was a great excuse to hang out in downtown Denver, and better yet, in the cool building designed by Frederic C. Hamilton, which makes a girl feel like she’s entering a piece of art.
After checking in, we went upstairs, where we waited in anticipation. They offered an audio guide narrated by Harrison Ford for purchase (we didn’t) and tickets to the 30 minute Egypt 3D: Secrets of the Mummies movie, which we liked (my youngest is seven). In retrospect, I wish we’d watched the movie first. Had we viewed it beforehand, I think it would’ve given my kids more “background” material on the pharaohs, culture, and religion, (even with its odd tangent in regard to medicine/DNA) and helped the kids absorb what they were seeing in the Tut exhibit.
In the first room, we watched a short intro film and then the doors opened in dramatic, Disney-esque fashion to the first hall. After this initial, narrow area, the crowd thankfully thinned out a bit, as people moved forward at a self-determined pace. The artifacts were amazing, beautifully displayed, nicely explained in signage, and giving insight into the life of the ancient kings and queens of Egypt. A lot of the display units were free-standing, so you could see the pieces from all sides. My kids’ favorites were:
- The 3000+ year old stone toilet seat
- The sarcophagus for a king’s cat, elaborately carved
- A sculpture of a scribe
The heavily guarded, general ancient Egypt exhibit was worthy of its own tour, with magnificent busts of kings and queens of old. There were several huge pieces that made it difficult to believe that they were “on tour” at all. Once through those major segments, there was a short film describing the discovery of King Tut’s tomb. With great excitement, we moved forward again. I loved how curators had placed huge photographs on the walls, detailing what the tomb looked like when it was found, giving visitors a feel for what it might’ve been like to actually be there in 1881.
Tut, like every other king of the era, believed he had to take what he wanted with him to the afterlife, so his tomb was packed with everything he’d need, from servants to ships. Our favorite parts of this portion of the exhibit were:
- The gold fan
- Toe and finger coverings
- His golden sandals (so hip! so NOW!)
- Model ships that were supposed to super-size to lifelike proportions in the afterlife
- The coffinette that held his stomach and other innards (part of mummification process)
- Tut’s cute, little rattan bed (he was only 5’6″, but still growing)
- Nat Geo film on the many layers of Tut’s sarcophagus
- Tut’s taste in jewelry (Did you know they had counter-weights in back for those heavy necklaces? I didn’t)
We turned the corner, and there was another, amazing, huge sculpture, but…no mummy. No gold mask. (Golden mask photo at top of post is a $2500 replica that you can buy for you very own home.) I turned around in confusion. I’d been preparing my squeamish preteen for the mummy (even if it wasn’t Tut himself) and was excited to see the kids’ reaction to that amazing mask—splashed on every ad piece for this exhibit I’d seen, from the museum’s web site to street banners to the brochure itself. But the exhibit ended there, with the requisite spillage into the museum gift store.
My husband turned back to the last guard. “There’s no gold mask?”
“No,” she said apologetically, like she’d had to say it far too often. “The mask last traveled in the 1970s, and they deemed it too fragile to travel again.”
Ahh. Well, certainly. I get that. I do. Some things are too priceless to jeopardize. But then don’t use it in all the advertising, I say. Because I felt like I’d been had. Set up. The advertising took an exhibit that I think I would’ve still very much enjoyed and made it, in the end, vaguely disappointing. The museum’s own web site states: “King Tut: Now on View.” I’d say, Hmm, that’s not really accurate. A better tag line might’ve been “Relics of the Ancient Egypt” or “Mysteries of the Tomb” or “King Tut’s Treasures.”
It’s all in the expectations, right? If you go, just know that there’s no golden mask and no mummy. Plenty of other treasures, just not The Biggie.
Outside the gift store, there was a room with an interactive display, allowing the kids to “explore” Tut’s burial chamber. Another film showed what happened to the boy king, who died at nineteen (they wonder if a severe leg break/subsequent infection did him in). These were also well done, and at this hour on a weeknight, it was empty, save for us and another family or two.
We printed out the kids’ names in hieroglyphics from a kiosk ($1), then walked over to Mad Greens, across from the museum, which is a good option for families. (They offer paninis, salads and a kids’ menu.)
I’m sure we’ll return for other DAM exhibits in the future, but I’ll do a little digging of my own for facts, first.
Posted on Monday, July 12, 2010
In Colorado, Trip Reports
Tags: dates of exhibit, Denver, Egypt, exhibit, golden mask, kids, King Tut, museum, review, Secrets of the Mummy, Tutankhamen



















[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lisa Tawn Bergren. Lisa Tawn Bergren said: My review of the King Tut exhibit…& how I think the Denver Art Museum misled me. #Denver #familytravel http://bit.ly/chpqsD [...]
That IS weird they would advertise it and yet not have it as a part of the exhibit! Now I won't be disappointed when I go.
Great review!
Oh, good. Didn't want to discourage anyone from going. Just didn't want everyone else to have that vague sense of disappointment at the end! One other thing to note with little kids: It'll be helpful to have an adult to hold each little one's hand. Guards are a little touchy–for good reason.
Thanks Lisa! I assumed that King Tut or his mask would be there too with all the advertising that has been on the air and at DIA (with the Anubis statue being placed there). Very disappointing….but at least we won't be as disappointed when we go.
Weird, huh? To their credit, it's hard to promote King Tut without using the most recognizable image out there…but…rename the exhibit? Put it in fine print somewhere? Hard for the marketing folks to be sure…but worse for customers to come out feeling suspicious of them in the future.
The gold funeral mask was NOT used in the advertising. The photos are actually of the mini-sarcophagus used to hold one of Tut's organs. It's a close-up of this intricately-detailed item, which actually is very cool and includes the crossed arms with the crook and flail.
Also, you're not supposed to climb on the giant broom. There's a friendly sign describing appropriate ways to enjoy the giant broom sculpture; climbing on it is not one of them since it can damage the sculpture.
Good grief! I stand corrected! Thanks for setting us straight. However, I maintain that the way the mini-sarcophagus is blown up and used, it misleads the public. Something for the museum mktg team to consider for future exhibits. And thanks for letting us know about the broom–obviously, we missed the sign. It shall not happen again.
This is a MISLEADING exhibit. There is barely anything in it from King Tut. It is expensive, crowded and totally overpriced!
We went on a Thursday at five, which made it relatively uncrowded, at least.
I was definitely fairly dissapointed with the exhibit. I had already heard that the gold mask no longer travels so, that was not a concern for me. The problem I had was there was hardly any of the popular jewelry and other items that I am so used to and was looking forward to seeing. The exhibit was not very long but however it did take a little too long to find my way around the place because it was so crowded. I would enjoy seeing it again but honestly, I don't think it was worth the money. Sadly, my girlfriend and I seemed to enjoy the other floors that the museum had to offer a bit more than Tut.
Thanks for adding in your perspective, Ted. We need to get back to the museum and explore the other floors…
I guess! I wondered the same thing…and good to know about PR–that's crazy.
The way this was advertised on TV was misleading. Even if the advertising is from the mini coffin it was made to look like the full size one that everyone knows. The New York Met Museum has a better standard egyptian display than this special exhibit for denver. Today the denver art museum earned its name. That DAM museum.
Thanks for letting us all know about the Met!